Skip to main content

Does Sammamish really want to be a regional growth center?


 

 

Anna Yorba

One of the arguments used in Sammamish's 2025 Town Center Plan and Code Amendment Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) to support increased population in the Town Center is quietly embedded in the middle of Sammamish's 2024 Comprehensive Plan as the following policy:


"LU 10.4. Pursue PSRC (Puget Sound Regional Council) Regional Growth Center designation."

A Regional Growth Center is defined as having dense existing jobs and housing, high-quality transit service, and planning for significant growth.

The Draft SEIS states:

"The City of Sammamish will pursue RGC status for the Town Center in the future as laid out in the City's 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update. This status prioritizes Town Center for consideration in funding allocated through the PSRC's planning processes, including grants for transit improvements, multimodal network upgrades, and infrastructure projects to support housing and job growth."

It should be noted that Sammamish is not included as a Regional Growth Center in the PSRC's Vision 2050 Plan.

The 2025 Draft SEIS examines the impacts of adding 2,000 more residential units to the 2,000 units currently approved in the Town Center Plan. It appears that the City is presenting these incremental increases as a way to avoid examining the impacts of their ultimate goal of achieving Regional Growth Center status.

If the City is pursuing status as a Regional Growth Center, a full Environmental Impact Statement should be required to assess the impacts of development necessary to meet RGC criteria. By dividing the ultimate project into smaller parts, the analysis of the current density increase makes each individual component appear less significant than the cumulative impact of the entire project. This approach can lead to an inadequate assessment of the overall environmental effects.

This piecemeal planning undermines the goals of the National and State Environmental Protection Agencies by potentially allowing significant cumulative impacts to go unrecognized or unmitigated.

I don't believe the citizens of Sammamish are aware of or support our current City government's push to pursue this designation. Enormous expenditures of tax dollars and negative impacts on our quality of life would be required to achieve RGC status due to our challenging topography, infrastructure constraints, lack of efficient transit access, and limited employment opportunities.

I urge the State Environmental Agency to send this Supplemental EIS back to the City of Sammamish in favor of a full EIS on the intended Regional Growth Center plan.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

📣 The Votes Are In on the Sammamish Town Center Plan — What’s Next?

  The Votes Are In on the Sammamish Town Center Plan City Council Passes Action Alternative (4,000 units, 85’ buildings) Before the final vote was accepted, Councilmember Kent Treen presented three alternative motions: 1. A hybrid option that would keep the 2,000-unit cap. Councilmember Lam seconded the motion. After discussion, the Council voted 6–1 against approving it. 2. Two additional alternatives were also introduced by Councilmember Treen but did not receive a second and therefore did not move forward. At the July 15, 2025 Sammamish City Council meeting, the Council voted on the future of the Town Center. They were asked to select one of three proposed alternatives: Proposed Options: 1. No Action Alternative Keeps the current cap of 2,000 housing units. Likely results in mostly townhomes and fewer community amenities such as retail, restaurants, and civic spaces. 2. Action Alternative Allows up to 4,000 units with a mix of apartments and condos, plus retail, restaurant, and...

A Dearth of Public Transit

The supporters of the supersized Town center hope that it will attract transit serving the Link station in Marymoor as well as a future Link station in Issaquah. This proposal has been part of the Town Center plan for some time now. However, when it comes to transit, the realities are quite different from what was initially proposed. Sammamish is considered a transit desert due to its limited public transportation options. There is only one Metro line with service at 30-minute intervals, which runs along 228th Street and goes to Overlake. The Metro development plan does not show any increase in service to the Sammamish area until 2029. Sound Transit operates under a 20-year plan that stretches until 2045, but it includes no service to Sammamish. However, there is a proposed Park and Ride facility located on 228th or Sahale Way, which will be built by 2045. The Sound Transit plan never starts new projects between ballot measures, and it has a history of missing its project timelines and...

Senior Citizens and the Sammamish Town Center Vision

Will our Town Center be a vibrant place for seniors--with “affordable housing,” other diverse housing options, walkability, accessible transit, and convenient shopping? As a Sammamish senior citizen, I hope so, but questions keep popping up. Senior citizen facilities—yes, but affordable? Merrill Gardens and Aegis are expected in the Town Center. But how many senior citizens would call these facilities “affordable?” And not all seniors need or want these types of facilities. “Affordable Housing”—how will seniors qualify? “Affordable housing” is the term for subsidized housing for those with incomes at or below 80% of the area median income. Our Town Center will have some affordable housing town homes and apartments. Many seniors who sell their homes are likely to have home equity income that could disqualify them from affordable housing. Those with less income might qualify, but will they want to live in apartment buildings with younger singles and young families? Maybe they would ...